The Assassination of Charlie Kirk
@sam There are a number of complex things going on right now, and what’s actually unfolding before our eyes is this. First, you can see Republican policymakers pushing for censorship—which is inherently anti-free speech. Next, the announcement on this incident by Donald Trump alone stated that offensive speech was not free speech, and “directly responsible to the terrorism,” which ironically goes against everything Charlie Kirk stood for—fundementally. Trump’s comments on calling people “Nazis” being directly responsible for terrorism only reinforce the narrative that offensive speech is not free speech—a terrifying statement coming from a leader who is supposed to protect our First Amendment.
Before I begin, let us not forget the fact that when law enforcement is under a lot of pressure and they don’t have a suspect, they are more prone to finding someone near the scene who’s plausibly suspicious and could pass as an official suspect if induced by pushing them to confess via MK-Ultra-style tactics. This is widely used across the nation, from local law enforcement to higher agencies. Sure, LEOs will argue this is simply bad detective work, but you would be surprised at what they have to do under pressure to save their budgets or even their careers. However, this event goes far deeper than a mere failure of security or poor detective work.
With the current suspect’s unfolding story, we can see that there’s an agenda to divide families—an agenda which has been occurring for a long time in this country. Although video analysis of the assassination and overwhelming evidence strongly suggest that the official suspect is innocent, the official narrative still claims he was suicidal. However, Sheriff Nate Brooksby publicly stated that Tyler Robinson, the suspect, had expressed fear of being shot and killed by SWAT in his own home, and appeared confused, which became the basis for the original implication that Robinson was suicidal. It has also been revealed that Tyler Robinson’s parents have remained silent about his innocence because they were threatened by federal authorities and forced into witness protection. Robinson was known to be very intelligent, which makes the supposed evidence all the more absurd: claims that he admitted to the attack through text messages and a note left under his keyboard, rather than simply waiting to speak to his roommate in person, do not align with the behavior of an intelligent individual.
What I will hold to be true is that this was a coordinated incident involving multiple professional agencies and the mainstream media, designed to chip away at our free speech and further divide our families. I am strongly leaning toward the assumption that the official suspect is innocent, based on the sketchy evidence provided so far. Based on video analysis of the assassination, it appears that a modified lavalier lapel mic or body vest was used as the weapon that killed Kirk. The device was detonated by someone who certainly was not Tyler Robinson, despite him being named as the official suspect. The method of attack closely resembles the “Israeli pager bombs” deployed in the Lebanon attack last year.
Modified lavalier lapel mic or body vest
I’d be curious to know why we continue to pay for DHS Fusion Centers if they continue to demonstrate that they cannot stop a single threat. From the recent church shooting that ended lethally, to multiple other incidents, Fusion Centers and their private-sector collaborators like Meta and YouTube continue to let us down. It’s as if Fusion Centers coordinate terrorism for Israeli intelligence, rather than prevent it—and it would be an interesting theory to prove. I can personally attest that something suspicious is going on, as all my Meta accounts were randomly deleted, and after clicking the “Download My Data” button, funny enough, my 1,000+ photos were nonexistent, and the folder contained only one profile photo from three years ago. Additionally, a decade ago, part of my uvula was cut off and I was subjected to grotesque torture by Mossad after refusing to serve as a Sayanim—to spy on high-profile members of my family and a close neighbor who was a two-time Republican state senator who did not accept money from AIPAC—and after humiliating the agents who attempted to recruit me. Prior to these personal events, my parents had no choice but to send me away multiple times, as they were threatened by child services, acting through the school board of directors, which attempted to take me, my brother, and my sister away under no legal premise other than what they considered to be odd behavior. I mention these things in this open letter about Kirk’s assassination to illustrate the lengths to which Mossad, U.S. agencies, and even actors within the education system are willing to go.
We have to be careful, as you may be up next—being disobedient of a President or Israel—and those of us who oppose the abstract finacial markets of debt, taxation, and centralized state power, that seperate our identity from our land. We must protect freedom in the midst of this coordinated psyop—directly fueling an agenda that is anti-free speech and anti-family by the support of traitors.