There Is No Such Thing As Racism
@sam The title is provocative but it is absolutely not promoting or representing American neo-Nazis or “white” supremacists. This discussion is deeply embedded in, and relevant to, melting pot, abstract market civilizations ruled by an elite of great disparity, a pattern that dates back to ancient Sumer.
If someone held a gun up and told me I could save either one Maasai person or my own brother by blood, and I chose my brother, and then they told me again I could save one Tibetan person or my brother, and I chose my brother, and then they told me a third time I could save one Arab or my brother, and I chose my brother, I would be considered a racist.
This reality hasn’t fully set yet—but it will, as they continue to destroy the natural reality of a nuclear family. It took a long time to get to where we are now. I think we can mostly agree that our immediate family is very communal—we borrow and share things from our parents and our siblings, we share a dinner table, we sleep under the same roof without locks on our doors. This used to be the way society worked for extended families and larger lineage groups. In the great region of Germania prior to its Romanization, life was not structured around abstract finacial markets, debt, taxation, and wage labor. We had responsibility and identity that was tied directly to the land we grew food on, herded, hunted, and even built a faith around—with the groves, rivers, and bogs of our land serving as a fundamental part of worship.
Today the Romanized social framework of abstract markets cutting up our identity is directly vesselled through Jewish diaspora and ideology pushed through Christianity. It promotes the equal ability to suffer, oppressing the traditional way of protecting our own lineage from suffering—and ironically, they both end up in the same disproportionate situation, yet one is deceptively based on wealth, while the other is brutally honest, based on lineage. We have been told that it is “racist” to favor protecting our own people and traditions over others. This word “racism” is baseless, and likewise, the idea we have “white people,” “black people,” and “brown people” is also baseless. The Romanized elite have totally washed away our identity using these nonintellectual terms and ideas, so that they can seperate us from our lands, and control us—using us to build their modern world that disproportionately benefits them oh so much compared to the rest of us.
There are only a few of us who are aware of this reality. If we even begin to suggest what’s going on, the idiotic archetype of a Romanized civilian will call us a “white supremacist,” even though American neo-Nazis help contribute to the brainwashing of the Romanized world, reinforcing pseudoscientific terms like “white people” and the melting pot ideology of Christianity—even if their version of Christianity is more aligned to “Positive Christianity.” We often see leaflets during “white supremacist” rallies that glorify the Roman Empire, reinforcing a Romanized world that ironically was held off for so long by the Germanic peoples—like the Battle of Teutoburg Forest that ended on 9/11, which annihilated more than 18,000 Roman soldiers and ended the Roman Empire’s conquest into Germania, eventually leading to the Roman elite’s strategy of using Christianity and Jewish diaspora as a psychological Trojan horse to conquer the great region, because they could not take down Germania by military force.
There is no such thing as racism—only a pseudoscientific idea that has been pushed on us through constant psyops. We do understand there is such thing as ethnic biases, especially biases favoring our immediate family over others, but this is normal behavior—not “racist” behavior. From a historical standpoint, we also know that there is much more stability in social systems built around shared heritage rather than “melting pot” ones. If we are going to point the finger at slavery as the smoking gun, let’s be real and call it out for what it was—Romanized systems built on abstract finacial markets that have existed within the single timeline of melting pot civilizations since ancient Sumer—having absolutely nothing to do with Germanic people and their traditions. It’s time we accept the forest for the trees.
The next chapter
In the age of robotics and AI, we’ve seen discussions and propaganda around “robotic rights” and “AI rights,” suggesting that robots can be “conscious” and feel pain. This idea is utterly absurd and irrational to propose in the first place, since the pain that justifies human rights is inherently biological. A robot may be designed to express pain in a way that mimics biology, but it is not real pain. More importantly, however, it is part of an agenda to strip away our rights and reduce humans to the level of consumer machines—making us less human and more equivalent to disposable robots. We couldn’t have come to this without a deliberate failure in the education system—one that cultivates the idea that a next-token generator or LLM could feel pain and possess consciousness.
The future is being shaped to eliminate immediate family—using the pseudoscientific concept of “racism” to chop up our tradition and identity—and enforcing equal suffering on the level of expendable consumer machines.